<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Singular State</title>
  <link>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com</link>
  <description>Advanced technical expertise for feasibility, prototyping and modernization. We build the working pilot and ramp up your team to take it forward.</description>
  <language>en-US</language>
  <atom:link href="https://singular-state.com/topics/legacy-replacement/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <item>
    <title>Where AI-written code actually breaks: rebuilding a CD-ROM encyclopedia</title>
    <link>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;experiments&#x2F;encarta-revival-where-ai-written-code-breaks&#x2F;</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;experiments&#x2F;encarta-revival-where-ai-written-code-breaks&#x2F;</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>An agent built a Tauri desktop application end to end. The pure logic was correct on the first or second attempt. Every defect that mattered sat at a boundary no headless test can reach.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Four reconstructions, one result: the defects land where no check reaches</title>
    <link>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;experiments&#x2F;four-experiments-in-ai-assisted-reconstruction&#x2F;</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;experiments&#x2F;four-experiments-in-ai-assisted-reconstruction&#x2F;</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>A scanned NASA specification, a novel, the memory of a product, and a sealed algorithm. What four controlled rebuilds establish about where AI-assisted reconstruction of legacy systems actually fails.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cutover reversibility under cheap generation</title>
    <link>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;cutover-reversibility-cheap-generation&#x2F;</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;cutover-reversibility-cheap-generation&#x2F;</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Cheap code lowers the cost of building the replacement. It does not lower the cost of being wrong about the legacy behaviour, and sent messages do not un-send.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Endowment effect meets parity-plus acceptance</title>
    <link>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;endowment-effect-parity-plus&#x2F;</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;endowment-effect-parity-plus&#x2F;</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>The behavioural evidence is contested, which is the argument for checking the workflow first. A replacement judged on new capability gets judged on missing capability instead.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>MVP against a working baseline</title>
    <link>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;mvp-against-a-working-baseline&#x2F;</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;mvp-against-a-working-baseline&#x2F;</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>A restricted replacement justified as an MVP while failing the operational needs of the users required to adopt it. The diagnosis is the removed work, not the feature count.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Shortest path to value</title>
    <link>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;shortest-path-to-value&#x2F;</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;shortest-path-to-value&#x2F;</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Waters&#x27; name for a legacy-replacement roadmap that delivers useful capability while limiting disruption. It answers a different question from an MVP, and the two coexist in one programme.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Walking skeleton, tracer bullet, strangler fig</title>
    <link>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;walking-skeleton-tracer-bullet-strangler-fig&#x2F;</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;singular-state.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;walking-skeleton-tracer-bullet-strangler-fig&#x2F;</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <description>Three patterns that build a thin end-to-end path before breadth. Two of them overlap and the third is a different kind of thing, because it has to keep an incumbent running alongside.</description>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
